Skip to main content

Emperor Norton I of North America and Protector of Mexico

In 1849, the year after gold was discovered at Sutter’s Mill in California, the famous California Gold Rush began.  Tens of thousands of people poured in to the territory, newly acquired in the Mexican War.  These people were referred to as “49ers”, claiming land all over California, prospecting for gold, sure they would strike it rich.  Most of them didn’t, but stayed anyway.

Finding gold wasn’t the only way to strike it rich, of course.  The English-born businessman Joshua A. Norton understood this.  He came to California in 1849 with $40,000 (which is the equivalent of about $1.2 million today).  Instead of gold, Norton decided to strike it rich in rice.

Norton didn’t farm rice, but he bought and sold it: he was a commodities trader, and did pretty well for himself.  By 1853, he’d turned his $40,000 into $250,000 (the modern equivalent of $3 million).  He saw an opportunity to make really big money during a rice shortage that year and attempted to corner the market.  If Norton could take control of all the rice in San Francisco, he could set the price for years to come.  The gold would come rolling in, and he wouldn’t even have to get his hands dirty digging it out of the ground.  But things didn’t work out so well for Norton.  He bought when he should have sold, the price of rice dropped, and he lost everything.  Bankrupt and ruined, Norton is said to have headed eastward out of San Francisco on foot and disappeared.

In 1859, Norton returned to San Francisco with news.  He headed straight to the offices of the San Francisco Bulletin with a piece of paper in his hand.  Norton said it was a royal decree, identifying himself as the unrecognized sovereign of the United States.  It was a good story, so the paper ran with it.

Locals ran with it, too.  When Norton strolled down the sidewalks of San Francisco on his royal walks, citizens would bow and curtsey to him as he passed.  The San Francisco city directory got in on the joke, listing Norton’s occupation as “Emperor”, which is how Joshua A. Norton became Emperor Norton I.

His Majesty Emperor Norton I of North America and Protector of Mexico in full imperial regalia.

Emperor Norton I of the United States was his official title for the first few years.  His popularity took off with his October 1859 decree that ordered Congress (always a favorite target) to stop meeting, which the local papers were only too happy to promote.  Congress kept meeting anyway, so in 1860, he issued another decree (which also got a lot of press) that officially dissolved Congress and replaced all federal power in the United States with one sole monarch: the Emperor.  In 1862, when France invaded Mexico, Norton opposed the invasion and made his sympathies clear when he revised his title as Emperor Norton I of the United States and Protector of Mexico.

A sensation was born.  Norton became a cherished local celebrity.  He didn’t have a palace, but the city of San Francisco furnished him with a modest apartment in a house.  He wore an old Navy coat with epaulets, for some class, and a plumed hat, for a regal turn.  He wore a sword on his hip.  Local restaurants allowed Norton to dine free of charge (as long as he allowed them to note that their establishment bear the imperial seal that read “By appointment of his Majesty, Emperor Norton I”.  Theater owners would reserve a seat for him every opening night.  When his Navy coat wore out, the Army officers at the Presidio pooled their resources to make him a new uniform.  Emperor Norton dolls were sold to tourists, and imperial currency was printed, bearing the Emperor’s visage.  The currency was never legal tender, but some establishments would accept it in payment anyway, and these banknotes are valuable collector’s items today.

Emperor Norton was famous for his imperial decrees.  Besides dissolving Congress, he was also known for decrees that:

  • San Franciscans furnish money for inventor Frederick Marriott’s experimental airships.
  • The Democratic and Republican parties be dissolved.
  • A suspension bridge be built connecting San Francisco and Oakland.
  • Residents abstain from using the abomination “Frisco” when referring to the city of San Francisco.

These last two decrees, at least, seem to have stuck.  The bridge to Oakland took a while—it wasn’t completed until 1936.  But the nickname “Frisco” never caught on, despite its common use in Norton’s day.  Some credit Norton with this, but it’s hard to say how much he influenced that trend.

On January 8, 1880, while walking to a lecture at the Academy of Natural Sciences, Norton dropped dead in the street.  The city was crestfallen, and there was no question of there being a grand funeral at taxpayers’ expense.  10,000 people turned out for the funeral, joining in a parade two miles long.  San Franciscans still to this day cherish Emperor Norton I.  But Congress doesn’t—they still have their meetings.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How the Lemon was Invented

Lemons How do you make a lemon?  Silly question, isn’t it?  You just take the seeds out of one and plant them, and wait for the tree to come up, right?  That’s true, but it hasn’t always been that easy.  Lemons today are a widely cultivated citrus fruit, with a flavor used in cuisines of countries where no lemon tree would ever grow.  You might think that it was just a matter of ancient peoples finding the trees, enjoying their fruit and growing more of them, but that’s not true.  The lemon is a human invention that’s maybe only a few thousand years old. The first lemons came from East Asia, possibly southern China or Burma.  (These days, some prefer to refer to Burma as Myanmar .  I’ll try to stay out of that controversy here and stick to fruit.)  The exact date of the lemon’s first cultivation is not known, but scientists figure it’s been around for more than 4,000 years.  The lemon is a cross breed of several fruits.  One f...

Origins of the Word Hoser, eh?

Rick Moranis and Dave Thomas as cultural icons Bob and Doug McKenzie These days we often hear Canadians referred to as “Hosers”.  It’s a strange word, and it sounds a little insulting, but it’s sometimes used more with affection than malice.  Any such word is difficult to use correctly, especially if you don’t belong to the group the word describes.   I can’t say I feel comfortable throwing the word around, myself, but I can offer a little information about it that might shed some light on what it means. First off: is it an insult?  Yes… and no.   The word hoser can be used as an insult or as a term of endearment; the variation hosehead , is certainly an insult.  It’s a mild insult, meaning something like jerk or idiot or loser .  Its origin is unclear, and there are several debatable etymologies of the word.  One claims that it comes from the days before the zamboni was invented, when the losing team of an outdoor ice hockey game...

The Whoopie Cap

What can you do with your father’s old hats?  If you were born after, say, 1955, the answer is probably “Not much.”  Men were still wearing fedoras in the 1970s and 1980s, but by 1990, fashion had turned to the point where unless you were Indiana Jones, the hat didn’t look right.  Some blame Jack Kennedy for starting it all, strutting around perfectly coiffed and bare-headed in the early 1960s.  In 1953, Harry Truman, a haberdasher by trade, stepped out of office, and just eight years later we had a president who didn’t care for hats?  The times, they were a-changin’. If you set the WABAC machine to the 1920s or 1930s (when Indiana Jones was supposed to have lived), you would see the fedora was still very much in style.  Men just didn’t leave the house without a hat of some kind, and for what remained of the middle class, the fedora was the topper of choice.  But like any other piece of clothing, hats wear out, too.  When that happened, you’d ju...